Skip to content

Head to head

Fraxel FTX vs HALO (2026)

Compare purchase costs, running costs and the evidence behind each device.

Read the comparison overview
Purchase cost
The catalog lists $100k–$150k (reported Joule/mJoule platform package with HALO) for HALO. No new-price range is on file for Fraxel FTX. Check the source notes and request current quotes.
FDA status
An FDA authorization is cited for Fraxel FTX. Check the linked record and scope notes for the exact model, indications and configuration. FDA status has not been verified for HALO.
Practice fit
Fraxel FTX: non-ablative fractional. HALO: hybrid fractional. Check each model’s US regulatory status and labeled indications for your intended use.

Non-Ablative Fractional

View full device profile →

Hybrid Fractional

View full device profile →

Price comparison

New price range

Solta Medical Fraxel FTX
Not published
Sciton HALO
$100k–$150k (reported Joule/mJoule platform package with HALO)Reported source: Dealer quote · Aug 30, 2026

Used price reference

Solta Medical Fraxel FTX
Not published
Sciton HALO
$62k–$169k (reported Joule/mJoule platform packages with HALO)Reported source: Used listing · Aug 30, 2026

Payback calculator

Solta Medical Fraxel FTX
View cost details

Next step

Solta Medical Fraxel FTX
Sciton HALO

Supplies & running costs

Supplies & restrictions

Solta Medical Fraxel FTX

Supply pricing is not documented with a dated source yet. Request an itemized supply quote.

View running-cost details
Sciton HALO

Supply pricing is not documented with a dated source yet. Request an itemized supply quote.

Supply restrictions: no published lock — no electronic gating documented

View running-cost details

FDA status & indications

FDA status & indication

Solta Medical Fraxel FTX
FDA record cited — see scopeK242142

Record scope: 510(k): K242142. Checked 4 Sep 2026.

Read FDA indication wording
“1550 nm: The Fraxel 1550 nm laser is indicated for use in dermatological procedures requiring the coagulation of soft tissue, as well as for skin resurfacing procedures. It is also indicated for treatment of dyschromia and cutaneous lesions, such as, but not limited to lentigos (age spots), solar lentigos (sunspots), actinic keratosis, and melasma, and for treatment of periorbital wrinkles, acne scars and surgical scars. 1927 nm: The Fraxel 1927 nm laser is indicated for use in dermatological procedures requiring the coagulation of soft tissue, treatment of actinic keratosis, and treatment of pigmented lesions such as, but not limited to lentigos (age spots), solar lentigos (sunspots) and ephelides (freckles).”
Sciton HALO
FDA status not verified

Record scope: The two previously attached citations do not establish the original HALO 1470/2940 nm configuration: K180508 describes the 2940 nm ProFractional system, while K182173 describes a 1927 nm system. Sciton identifies HALO as a dual-wavelength JOULE treatment. The exact clearance-to-configuration link remains under review; this is not a finding that HALO lacks FDA clearance.

Which chains run each

Chain adoption

Solta Medical Fraxel FTX
0 recorded pairings
Sciton HALO
0 recorded pairings

Chains using it

Solta Medical Fraxel FTX
—
Sciton HALO
—

Approved reviews

Solta Medical Fraxel FTX
0
Sciton HALO
0

Specs and platform

Manufacturer

Solta Medical Fraxel FTX
Solta Medical
Sciton HALO
Sciton

Built by (OEM)

Solta Medical Fraxel FTX
Solta Medical Inc.
Sciton HALO
Sciton Inc.

Category

Solta Medical Fraxel FTX
Non-Ablative Fractional
Sciton HALO
Hybrid Fractional

Technology

Solta Medical Fraxel FTX
Fractional resurfacing laser
Sciton HALO
Hybrid 1470nm + 2940nm fractional (Erbium)

Launch year

Solta Medical Fraxel FTX
—
Sciton HALO
2014

Status

Solta Medical Fraxel FTX
Current
Sciton HALO
Current

Manufacturing relationship evidence

Solta Medical Fraxel FTX
No separate manufacturing-relationship record linked.
Sciton HALO
No separate manufacturing-relationship record linked.

Current alternatives

Current catalog models in related categories. Confirm availability and configuration with the supplier.

Device and company names are trademarks of their respective owners. The Aesthetic Index is not affiliated with or endorsed by any manufacturer, distributor or lender named here, except as disclosed. Price figures are references, not current offers. Check each device’s source notes. Not medical, legal or regulatory advice.