Head to head

CMSlim vs truFlex (2026)

Compare purchase costs, running costs and the evidence behind each device.

Read the comparison overview

Purchase cost: The catalog lists $25k–$50k for CMSlim. No new-price range is on file for truFlex. Check the source notes and request current quotes.
FDA status: CMSlim has no US FDA clearance on file. An FDA authorization is cited for truFlex. Check the linked record and scope notes for the exact model, indications and configuration.
Practice fit: Both are listed under body contouring. Check each model’s US regulatory status and labeled indications for your intended use.

Device A

Body Contouring

View full device profile →

Device B

Body Contouring

View full device profile →

Price comparison

Price comparison: Daeyang Medical CMSlim vs Cutera truFlex (flex+)
Attribute	Daeyang Medical CMSlim	Cutera truFlex (flex+)
New price range	$25k–$50kSource not documented	Not published
Payback calculator	View ROI calculator	View cost details
Next step

New price range

Daeyang Medical CMSlim: $25k–$50kSource not documented
Cutera truFlex (flex+): Not published

Payback calculator

Daeyang Medical CMSlim: View ROI calculator
Cutera truFlex (flex+): View cost details

Next step

Daeyang Medical CMSlim

Cutera truFlex (flex+)

Supplies & running costs

Supplies & running costs: Daeyang Medical CMSlim vs Cutera truFlex (flex+)
Attribute	Daeyang Medical CMSlim	Cutera truFlex (flex+)
Supplies & restrictions	Supply details not yet documented. View running-cost details	Requires Cutera cycle refills plus single-use truGel hydrogel pads — both booked as consumable revenue in Cutera's 10-K. Manufacturer-provided · Aug 31, 2026 Supply restrictions: usage-metered — treatment credits, pulses or usage charges apply View running-cost details

Supplies & restrictions

Daeyang Medical CMSlim: Supply details not yet documented.
View running-cost details
Cutera truFlex (flex+): Requires Cutera cycle refills plus single-use truGel hydrogel pads — both booked as consumable revenue in Cutera's 10-K.
Manufacturer-provided · Aug 31, 2026
Supply restrictions: usage-metered — treatment credits, pulses or usage charges apply
View running-cost details

FDA status & indications

FDA status & indications: Daeyang Medical CMSlim vs Cutera truFlex (flex+)
Attribute	Daeyang Medical CMSlim	Cutera truFlex (flex+)
FDA status & indication	No US 510(k) located Record scope: No US 510(k) or FDA device listing was located for this model (checked 8 Sep 2026). Lenders and insurers may ask for regulatory documentation before financing or covering a device without US clearance.	FDA record cited — see scopeK251594, K212866 Record scope: OEM clearance: K251594 (truFlex, Syrma Johari Medtech Limited, decision 28 Aug 2025) and K212866 (truSculpt flex, Johari Digital Healthcare Limited, 3 Dec 2022) — the manufacturer's records; FDA's device listing carries truFlex under both Syrma Johari MedTech and Cutera. Checked 8 Sep 2026. Read FDA indication wording “truFlex is indicated to be used for: • Improvement of abdominal tone, for strengthening of the abdominal muscles, for development of firmer abdomen. • Strengthening, toning and firming of arms, buttocks, thighs, and calves • Relaxation of muscle spasms • Prevention or retardation of disuse atrophy • Increasing local blood circulation • Muscle re-education • Maintaining or increasing range of motion • Immediate post-surgical stimulation of calf muscles to prevent venous thrombosis • Stimulation of neuromuscular tissue for bulk muscle excitation in the legs or arms for rehabilitative purposes • To be used under medical supervision for adjunctive therapy for the treatment of medical diseases and conditions The device safety and efficacy was demonstrated by performance data and a comparison of technical characteristics between the modified device and the predicate device.”

FDA status & indication

Daeyang Medical CMSlim: No US 510(k) located
Record scope: No US 510(k) or FDA device listing was located for this model (checked 8 Sep 2026). Lenders and insurers may ask for regulatory documentation before financing or covering a device without US clearance.
Cutera truFlex (flex+): FDA record cited — see scopeK251594, K212866
Record scope: OEM clearance: K251594 (truFlex, Syrma Johari Medtech Limited, decision 28 Aug 2025) and K212866 (truSculpt flex, Johari Digital Healthcare Limited, 3 Dec 2022) — the manufacturer's records; FDA's device listing carries truFlex under both Syrma Johari MedTech and Cutera. Checked 8 Sep 2026.
Read FDA indication wording
“truFlex is indicated to be used for: • Improvement of abdominal tone, for strengthening of the abdominal muscles, for development of firmer abdomen. • Strengthening, toning and firming of arms, buttocks, thighs, and calves • Relaxation of muscle spasms • Prevention or retardation of disuse atrophy • Increasing local blood circulation • Muscle re-education • Maintaining or increasing range of motion • Immediate post-surgical stimulation of calf muscles to prevent venous thrombosis • Stimulation of neuromuscular tissue for bulk muscle excitation in the legs or arms for rehabilitative purposes • To be used under medical supervision for adjunctive therapy for the treatment of medical diseases and conditions The device safety and efficacy was demonstrated by performance data and a comparison of technical characteristics between the modified device and the predicate device.”

Which chains run each

Which chains run each: Daeyang Medical CMSlim vs Cutera truFlex (flex+)
Attribute	Daeyang Medical CMSlim	Cutera truFlex (flex+)
Chain adoption	0 recorded pairings	0 recorded pairings
Chains using it	—	—
Approved reviews	0	0

Chain adoption

Daeyang Medical CMSlim: 0 recorded pairings
Cutera truFlex (flex+): 0 recorded pairings

Chains using it

Daeyang Medical CMSlim: —
Cutera truFlex (flex+): —

Approved reviews

Daeyang Medical CMSlim: 0
Cutera truFlex (flex+): 0

Specs and platform

Specs and platform: Daeyang Medical CMSlim vs Cutera truFlex (flex+)
Attribute	Daeyang Medical CMSlim	Cutera truFlex (flex+)
Manufacturer	Daeyang Medical	Cutera
Built by (OEM)	Daeyang Medical Co., Ltd.	Cutera Inc.
Category	Body Contouring	Body Contouring
Technology	Magnetic muscle stimulation (EMS / muscle stimulation)	Multi-directional EMS (EMS / muscle stimulation)
Launch year	2020	2023
Status	Current	Current
Manufacturing relationship evidence	No separate manufacturing-relationship record linked.	No separate manufacturing-relationship record linked.

Manufacturer

Daeyang Medical CMSlim: Daeyang Medical
Cutera truFlex (flex+): Cutera

Built by (OEM)

Daeyang Medical CMSlim: Daeyang Medical Co., Ltd.
Cutera truFlex (flex+): Cutera Inc.

Current alternatives

Current catalog models in related categories. Confirm availability and configuration with the supplier.

Allergan Aesthetics CoolTone

EMS/HIFEM muscle stimulation

New-equipment price not yet documented.

Rohrer BodyTone

EMS/HIFEM muscle stimulation

New-equipment price reference

$49,995 (Rohrer-advertised price)

Reported source: Manufacturer-provided · Oct 1, 2026

Check the profile for configuration and price details.

Sofwave Pure Impact

EMS/HIFEM muscle stimulation

New-equipment price not yet documented.

Iskra Medical TeslaFormer

EMS/HIFEM muscle stimulation

New-equipment price reference

$80k–$120k

Source not documented

Check the profile for configuration and price details.

Get a free recommendation Browse by goal

Device and company names are trademarks of their respective owners. The Aesthetic Index is not affiliated with or endorsed by any manufacturer, distributor or lender named here, except as disclosed. Price figures are references, not current offers. Check each device’s source notes. Not medical, legal or regulatory advice.