Head to head

Clear + Brilliant Touch vs Fraxel Dual (2026)

Compare purchase costs, running costs and the evidence behind each device.

Read the comparison overview

Purchase cost: Catalog new-price ranges: Clear + Brilliant Touch, $50k–$70k; Fraxel Dual, $90k–$120k. Check the source notes and request current quotes.
Practice fit: Both are listed under non-ablative fractional. Check each model’s US regulatory status and labeled indications for your intended use.

Device A

Non-Ablative Fractional

View full device profile →

Device B

Non-Ablative Fractional

View full device profile →

Price comparison

Price comparison: Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch vs Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual)
Attribute	Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch	Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual)
New price range	$50k–$70kSource not documented	$90k–$120kSource not documented
Used asking range	Not published	$20k–$45kSource not documented
Payback calculator	View ROI calculator	View ROI calculator
Next step

New price range

Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch: $50k–$70kSource not documented
Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual): $90k–$120kSource not documented

Used asking range

Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch: Not published
Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual): $20k–$45kSource not documented

Payback calculator

Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch: View ROI calculator
Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual): View ROI calculator

Next step

Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch

Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual)

Consumable economics

Consumable economics: Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch vs Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual)
Attribute	Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch	Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual)
Consumable cost / lock-in	—	Supply pricing is not documented with a dated source yet. Request an itemized supply quote.
Service cost	Not published	Not published

Consumable cost / lock-in

Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch: —
Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual): Supply pricing is not documented with a dated source yet. Request an itemized supply quote.

Service cost

Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch: Not published
Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual): Not published

FDA clearance

FDA clearance: Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch vs Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual)
Attribute	Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch	Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual)
FDA status & indication	FDA ClearedK223647, K110349 Read FDA indication wording “The CLEAR + BRILLIANT TOUCH® System is indicated for use in dermatological procedures requiring the coagulation of soft tissue and general skin resurfacing procedures.”	FDA ClearedK130193, K062303 Read FDA indication wording “1550 nm: The Fraxel 1550 nm laser is indicated for use in dermatological procedures requiring the coagulation of soft tissue, as well as for skin resurfacing procedures. It is also indicated for treatment of dyschromia and cutaneous lesions, such as, but not limited to lentigos (age spots), solar lentigos (sun spots), actinic keratosis, and melasma, and for treatment of periorbital wrinkles, acne scars and surgical scars. 1927 nm: The Fraxel 1927 nm laser is indicated for use in dermatological procedures requiring the coagulation of soft tissue, treatment of actinic keratosis, and treatment of pigmented lesions such as, but not limited to lentigos (age spots), solar lentigos (sun spots) and ephelides (freckles).”

FDA status & indication

Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch: FDA ClearedK223647, K110349
Read FDA indication wording
“The CLEAR + BRILLIANT TOUCH® System is indicated for use in dermatological procedures requiring the coagulation of soft tissue and general skin resurfacing procedures.”
Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual): FDA ClearedK130193, K062303
Read FDA indication wording
“1550 nm: The Fraxel 1550 nm laser is indicated for use in dermatological procedures requiring the coagulation of soft tissue, as well as for skin resurfacing procedures. It is also indicated for treatment of dyschromia and cutaneous lesions, such as, but not limited to lentigos (age spots), solar lentigos (sun spots), actinic keratosis, and melasma, and for treatment of periorbital wrinkles, acne scars and surgical scars. 1927 nm: The Fraxel 1927 nm laser is indicated for use in dermatological procedures requiring the coagulation of soft tissue, treatment of actinic keratosis, and treatment of pigmented lesions such as, but not limited to lentigos (age spots), solar lentigos (sun spots) and ephelides (freckles).”

Which chains run each

Which chains run each: Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch vs Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual)
Attribute	Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch	Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual)
Chain adoption	0 recorded pairings	0 recorded pairings
Chains using it	—	—
Approved reviews	0	0

Chain adoption

Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch: 0 recorded pairings
Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual): 0 recorded pairings

Chains using it

Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch: —
Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual): —

Approved reviews

Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch: 0
Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual): 0

Specs and platform

Specs and platform: Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch vs Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual)
Attribute	Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch	Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual)
Manufacturer	Solta	Solta
Built by (OEM)	Solta Medical Inc.	Solta Medical Inc.
Category	Non-Ablative Fractional	Non-Ablative Fractional
Technology	1440nm + 1927nm dual handpiece (Diode laser)	1550nm + 1927nm thulium fractional
Launch year	2021	2009
Status	Current	Current
Manufacturer source record	No linked source on file.	No linked source on file.

Manufacturer

Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch: Solta
Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual): Solta

Built by (OEM)

Solta Clear + Brilliant Touch: Solta Medical Inc.
Solta Fraxel Dual (re:store Dual): Solta Medical Inc.

Current alternatives

Current catalog models in related categories. Confirm availability and configuration with the supplier.

Solta Medical Fraxel FTX

Non-Ablative Fractional

New: —

Lutronic LaseMD Ultra

Non-Ablative Fractional

New: $60k–$90k

Palomar/Cynosure Icon

Non-Ablative Fractional

New: $70k–$100k

Candela Frax Pro (Nordlys)

Non-Ablative Fractional

New: —

Get a free recommendation Browse by goal

Device and company names are trademarks of their respective owners. The Aesthetic Index is not affiliated with or endorsed by any manufacturer, distributor or lender named here, except as disclosed. Price figures are references, not current offers. Check each device’s source notes. Not medical, legal or regulatory advice.